<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>  Balkingpoints.com / Balkers &#187; free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/tag/free-speech/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>China: Google&#8217;s possible exile leads to cyber protests; Netizens on move</title>
		<link>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/879</link>
		<comments>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/879#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original attribution Global Voices Online

Do no evil, Google says. But the irony is that it did help the Chinese government block sensitive information from the Chinese internet users, which is necessary for it to operate in China. However, this time it seems to be really provoked and made its simmering feud with the authority public. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">Original attribution <a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2010/01/13/china-googles-possible-exile-leads-to-cyber-protests-netizens-on-move" rel="nofollow"  target="blank">Global Voices Online</a></div>
<p><span id="more-879"></span><br />
Do no evil, Google says. But the irony is that it did help the Chinese government block sensitive information from the Chinese internet users, which is necessary for it to operate in China. However, this time it seems to be really provoked and made its simmering feud with the authority public. Google is likely to quit China.</p>
<p>The <a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html" >post on Google blog</a> states the Google China has been suffering from cyber attacks and also, the information of its clients, many of them human rights advocates, were accessed by third party.</p>
<p>What is more well-known is its self-censorship. For example, typing in words such as Tiananmen in Google.cn will never return you pictures or texts about the 1989 incident.</p>
<p>So, when last night Google announced it would lift the censorship, the Chinese internet users flooded to the website to search for all the sensitive terms they never had a chance to access. In twitters, forums, discussion boards, we witness an explosion of talks about Google and its possible departure, or exile, from China.</p>
<p>On Twitter, <a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/pzhtx" >pzhtx</a> said,</p>
<blockquote><p>In the list of pop tags, “Tiananmen” rises to the first place. The Chinese netizens are saying goodbye to Google in this way.</p></blockquote>
<p>People were mourning that they are now restricted inside the largest LAN network in the world, which is encircled by the strict censorship and the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/search?q=great+firewall&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a" >Great Firewall</a>.<br />
A tweet is madly circulated on the internet:</p>
<blockquote><p>The sin of facebook is that it helps people know who they wanna know. The sin of Twitter is that it allows people to say what they wanna say. The sin of Google is that it lets people find what they wanna find, and Youtube let us see what we wanna see. So, they are all kicked away.</p></blockquote>
<p>It directly affects millions of netizens, because since Google’s expansion in China, its search engine, Gmail, and Google Doc have been widely used. A netizen in Xiaonei, which is a social network website popular among young people, was panic:</p>
<blockquote><p>I saw that “Google planned to quit the Chinese market”. I was scared awake…My Gmail, My Google docs, my Google Search, and my internet.</p></blockquote>
<p>These days are uncommon for Chinese cyberspace. Baidu has just been hacked by self-alleged Iranian hackers, which prompted a cyber war. As a Chinese local search engine with the largest market share, Baidu is often compared with Google. Its reputation is blackened because of its stronger censorship and the fact that it has removed search returns about poisonous milk after taking money from the producers.</p>
<blockquote><p>Baidu will show you nothing that you shouldn’t know, but Google is the opposite. It knows too much.</p></blockquote>
<p>Google is highly praised among internet users:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google quit Chinese market?! A firm of backbone! In a place without democracy, Google prefers to quit. What is more important, money or morality? I won’t say foreigners are impolite anymore, because they have shown us what it means by ‘sacrifice oneself for justice’. Look at the Chinese nowadays, the merit of ancestors were gone. I am ashamed to call us the offspring of the Huaxia Great China.</p></blockquote>
<p>A sarcastic price of words is getting quite popular around the cyberspace.</p>
<blockquote><p>People born in 90s: Today I stepped out of the Great Firewall and saw a foreign website named Google. Shit, it is all but a copy of Baidu.<br />
Born in 00s: What do you mean by stepping out of Great Firewall?<br />
Born in 10s: What do you mean by website?<br />
Born in 20s: What is ‘foreign’?</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Tang Peng shouted: Great Party, Long live the CCP dynasty!! Finally Google would like to quit the Chinese market ‘voluntarily’!!</p></blockquote>
<p>People soon make up how the state-run media CCTV might comment on the incident.</p>
<blockquote><p>Recently because Google encountered issues such as obscene search returns, infringement on copyrights, it is boycotted by the Chinese netizens. Also due to the decreasing revenue, it is considering to quit the Chinese market. This is another case of boycotting a perverted foreign website by Chinese people.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right now, a campaign to put flowers to the Google offices in China is gaining momentum on the internet. It is thought to be a way to memorize Google and express the grief and anger against censorship. In front of the Google Beijing office, people have started to take action for a flower commemoration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/879/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China: The fear implied in a real-name internet</title>
		<link>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/406</link>
		<comments>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/406#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Chen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/?p=406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Original attribution Global Voices Online


In China, the internet has become an important platform for citizens&#8217; participation in policy making and criticism of officials. The freedom of the internet is largely guaranteed by the anonymity it offers users. However efforts to deprive the users of such freedom have never stopped. Not long ago, a young man [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry">Original attribution <a href="http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/05/06/china-the-fear-implied-in-a-real-name-internet" rel="nofollow"  target="blank">Global Voices Online</a></div>
<div class="entry">
<span id="more-406"></span><br />
In China, the internet has become an important platform for citizens&#8217; participation in policy making and criticism of officials. The freedom of the internet is largely guaranteed by the anonymity it offers users. However efforts to deprive the users of such freedom have never stopped. Not long ago, a young man in Shanghai <a href="http://www.eoc.com.cn/?action-viewnews-itemid-21633"  rel="nofollow" target="blank">was arrested because </a>he accused his hometown government of corruption. The amazing fact is that the local police traveled hundreds of miles to Shanghai to hunt him down after identifying him as the blogger.</p>
<p>Now the authorities in Hangzhou seems to be taking these effort even further. The city congress has legislated that all local users, including bloggers, should register with their real names.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://club.news.sohu.com/r-ztx-79991-0-24-900.html"  rel="nofollow" target="blank">post</a> by blogger <em>West-of-Lake-West</em> is very popular on the internet these days. This blog entry detailed several articles in a regulation which was to be implemented on 1st May. The piece of law, passed by city congress, is named ‘Regulation on Protection of Computer Information and Internet safety&#8217; (计算机信息网络安全保护管理条例).</p>
<p>In article 18, the blogger found that</p>
<blockquote><p>…..应当记录上网用户的上网时间，用户帐号，互联网网络地址或者域名，主角电话号码等信息。</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">The internet service providers must record the time, account, IP and telephone number of their users.</div>
<p>The blogger questioned:</p>
<blockquote><p>我要问的是，如果我去杭州百货大楼去买某品牌的衣服，我需要向杭州大厦登记我的姓名，地址，身份证号码么？有这样的道理么?凭什么我去上网，我的上网信息要被他们记录。你给我个理由，你问过我们没有？</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">I want to ask, if I am shopping for clothes in a department store , should I have to register my name, address and ID? Does that make sense? Give me a reason. Have you ever asked our opinion about this law?</div>
<p>He then posted online the article 19:</p>
<blockquote><p>提供电子公告，网络游戏和其他即时通信服务的，具有用户注册信息和发布信息审核功能的，并如实想起申请开设上述服务的用户的有效身份证明。电子公告指的是户料网上的论坛，聊天室，留言板，博客等交互形式。</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">The providers of online Bulletin Board Systems, online games and other instant messaging services, must obtain the identification of the users. The services the regulation concerns include online forums, chat rooms, bulletin boards and blogs.</div>
<p>An article he found to be the most ridiculous is:</p>
<blockquote><p>鼓动公众恶意评论他人，公开发布他人隐私，或者通过暗示，影射等方式，对他人进行人身攻击的。</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">It is illegal to encourage the public to viciously comment on others, publish about others privacy, or commit personal attacks on others by alluding or imputation.</div>
<p>He made fun of the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>再说了，我想请教法律专家，如何操控定义恶意评论他人，更如何在法律的框架下定义影射与暗示。我说，在杭州有一个姓王的胖子很坏，我是不是影射那个胖子王姓市委书记？</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">I want to ask the experts how to define ‘viciously comment&#8217; under the new law in a way compatible with the principle of legislation? I say, there is a bad, fat guy surnamed Wang in Hangzhou. Am I then alluding to the head of Hangzhou government who happens also to be fat and surnamed Wang?</div>
<p>Finally he said he would be considered as a criminal after 1 May, because</p>
<blockquote><p>注意，我这篇帖子违反了法律：首先没有身份登记，还有鼓动公众恶意评论，第三，我还可能影射了一个胖子，这个胖子有人说是苹果王，有人说是王苹果，还还有王书籍。。。</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">Take note, this post exactly violates the law! First I didn&#8217;t register my information, second I encourage ‘vicious comment&#8217; and third, I am alluding to a fat man. Someone says it is Wang A, another says it is Wang B and a third says its the Party Secretary Wang….so who is correct?</div>
<blockquote><p>我们该怎么面对这份法律，我们以后还能怎么说话？我们还有没有批评权利？谁能保证我们在批评的时候的权利？</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">How could we live with this law? How could we speak up in the future? Are we allowed to criticize anyone? Who can guarantee our right to complain?</div>
<blockquote><p>我们向全国网友求救。、。。。</p></blockquote>
<div class="translation">We ask for help from netizens all over the country.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.balkingpoints.com/balk/archives/406/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
